In this article from usatoday.com, the eight values of free expression are used to communicate the issue of the reduction in vaccinations that are recommended by the CDC from 17 to 11. Currently there is a lot of debate going around the U.S., specifically in Florida, New Jersey, and Texas, on mandated vaccinations. I have background knowledge on this topic due to a project I recently finished, therefore I was glad to speak more about it. People feel that they should not be told they have to "inject" something into their bodies when they don't know what it is and the long-term effects of it. This also applies to vaccinating their children and the parents' say in this. By using the eight values of free expression, the people are able to give their viewpoints on the rollbacks.
1. Marketplace of Ideas
This article reflects on differing perspectives like federal health public health authorities, state leadership, medical professionals, and citizens that are concerned about their health and their family's health. Free expansion ensures that there isn't one viewpoint that dominates the rest by force. Instead of this, ideas are heard publicly so that the people can compare arguments about vaccines and their safety, public health priorities and, of course, personal freedom.
2. Participation in Self-Government
Democracy depends on the citizens; however, they need to be educated and informed. Free expansion allows for voters to hear arguments for and against vaccine policies to change, like which vaccines are mandated and which ones are not. They decide this based on a ballot box and however people decide to vote. Public debate over health policy enables people to influence government direction through discussion, activism and elections.
3. Stable Change
Free expression acts as a type of safety exit for social tension. Having the open debate and letting citizens give their opinion on the topic prevents or reduces the likelihood of violence. When having these public debates, speeches, and commentary through the media about disagreements, it allows change to occur through dialogue rather than force. Like DeSantis mentioned in the article, you have to ask yourself whether someone is coercing a vaccine or other medical device on you or if they are recommending it. If you feel they are coercing it, you have the freedom to say you do not want it.
4. Individual Self-Fulfillment
Freedom of expression shows support to individuals' ability to form and voice their opinions and personal beliefs about health, risk, and the government authority. By allowing people to express their fears, concerns, or support regarding the vaccines, freedom of speech respects personal values in terms of medical decisions. In the article, Robert Kennedy made a comment saying that doctors are there to vaccinate, not evaluate, meaning the doctors should not be coercing you into taking a vaccine, the only thing they should be doing is giving you the vaccine because that is their job. They shouldn't be pressuring you on a medical subject such as vaccines when it is your choice.
5. Check on Governmental PowerCredible journalists play a critical role in the "watchdog" process, reporting on CDC reduction of vaccines, state views, and political reasoning. This article is actually an example itself as a type of "watchdog" because it is questioning why policies change, who supports these policies, and what consequences may become of these decisions and policies. This inspection often causes officials to have to justify their actions to the public. State governments tend to have more power than the federal government. States have the final say on whether or not vaccines should be mandated, however, as stated in the article, CDC recommendations can greatly influence individuals to get vaccinated, even if they aren't mandatory.
6. Promote Tolerance
Free expression allows for elected officials, journalists, experts and citizens to openly criticize decisions made my important and related institutions like the CDC or the government, specifically state governments. In this article, Ron DeSantis challenges the federal health guidance, publicly. He explains how free speech enables political leaders to disagree with national policy and presents alternative viewpoints without censorship. DeSantis said individuals should be able to make the best decisions for themselves, not for the manufacturers of the vaccines.
7. Promote Innovation
There is open expression
when having scientific claims and policy decisions. When mandating vaccines and promoting them, citizens rely on evolving data, and free speech allows for researchers, doctors, and commentators to debate evidence, question it, and recognize possible risks and flaws in the vaccines and the evidence supporting them. Without free expression, scientific solidarity could decline or be shaped by political pressure, rather than evidence. Dr. Lapado mentioned how mandated vaccines "drips into disdain and slavery," and then goes further to say, "who am I to tell you what your child should put in their body?" This goes to show the Florida officials have a specific viewpoint on mandated vaccines and feel it should be the individual's choice, not anyone else's.
8. Protect Dissent
Public health debates often involve unpopular or controversial opinions. Free expression protects individuals that challenge superior ideas, whether or not they are skeptical or critical of vaccine mandates and their reduction. The article presents how dissent is legally and culturally protected in a free society. Growing up, especially during the COVID pandemic, a lot of my friends were getting vaccinated, and a lot of them weren't. There was not a lot of information out about the vaccination, and it was created in such a short amount of time compared to other vaccines. This created a lot of controversy amongst my community and the U.S. as a whole. Free expression protected the citizens by allowing them to speak out about this and not take the vaccine if they did not want to.
According to
this article, Florida has made the decision to stand behind the CDC in their decision to have a vaccine rollback. The eight values of free expression have contributed to this subject because they allow citizens to make their own decisions and speak freely. It can be hard to make your own decisions on topics such as vaccines, however, when the topic becomes political and coerced, it may feel impossible to stand up for yourself. With the eight values of free expression, they allow you to do this freely.